Intense debates continue over the concepts of "standards" and "qualifications" in software testing. Can the subjective nature of human-driven software exploration and quality auditing truly be standardized? Does certification foster a potentially misleading sense of confidence, completion of skills, and even complacency? Is it possible for one organization or group to impose standardization or accreditation without the agreement or endorsement of others?

Read this Blog Also- https://www.testevolve.com/blo....g/software-testing-c